a couple weeks ago, we referred to one Richard Dawkins, an evolutionary biologist and outspoken critic of all things religious. No one faults him for his intellect, only his logic. Here’s one analysis of that logic from a fellow secularist. It’s taken a second read for me to get his point, but the extra effort is worth it. It’s, as the title of this post crudely suggests, a critique with a purpose and avoids the temptation of taking personal pot-shots at Sir Richard.
Leave a comment